Abstract

In a randomized experiment in cooperation with two national parties competing in the 2013 congressional election in the Philippines, we estimate the causal effect on voting behavior of a town-hall style campaign in which candidates debate with voters. Keeping the parties’ platform fixed, we find that this “deliberative” style has a positive effect on parties’ vote shares compared to the status quo, in which voters play a passive role. Consistent with the parties’ advocacy for underprivileged groups, we observe heterogeneous effects by income and gender. We show that the larger effect of town-hall meetings on women and poor voters arises because deliberative campaigns are more effective in changing voters’ attitudes on gender inequality and poverty, as emphasized in parties’ platforms.

Download Paper (Last Version: March 2017)
Download Appendix